Turn Obligation into Choice

I have the tendency to think of things I ought to do, or ought to have done. But that way of looking at events is very passive.

Instead, I can choose to look at those things as choices.

For instance, if I think “I should have done xyz…,” which leaves me in a position of regret. I can re-tell that story as “I chose not to do xyz…”

At that point, I’ve changed the locus of control from the past (external) to myself (internal).

Relating to my past and future in this way not only “empowers” me, but also leads to more active decision-making.

I’m playing with this right now…definitely interested to hear other perspectives on this type of practice.

The Gamut of Selves

We don’t have to do anything in particular in order to play (be in the play-state), other than to release certain inhibitions we have about ourselves, others, and “rules.”

To do that, it may be beneficial to practice identifying the other states we assume throughout the day. For most of us, these other states will be characterized by certain “selves.”

For instance, I’ve already discussed The Victim. There are also the roles of “the persecutor,” “protector/rescuer,” “coach,” “challenger,” “cynic,” “skeptic.” And above those there may be others, like the “controller,” the “buddha/enlightened one,” etc.

For more information on this, check out the book (or videos) TED –

We each have our own unique cast of characters. And, though they’ll often assume similar roles, our cast is unlike any other cast. Each role may be played by a different person, depending on our own personal history.

As we go through the day, and experience emotions of different sorts, different characters come in to play.

In order to witness these folks, it is necessary to learn to notice shifts in our energy state – in our emotional or attentional state – as they occur.

When we feel “high,” who is in charge? When we feel “stressed,” who is in charge? When we are in love, who is in charge? When we are angry, who is it? If we feel like we’ve failed at something, who is the voice, the character, that comes up to the front of the stage of our mind?

This process requires awareness and attention, which requires slowing down.

It’s just like learning any new skill. Think about the first time you played a new game of some sort. You had to slow down to learn the technique. You may have “frozen” certain parts of your body or movements in order to work on the technique in pieces. In motor learning it’s called “freeing and freezing degrees of freedom.” You may have moved very clumsily at first, and felt awkward.*

That’s normal.

Now aware of this – that learning requires slowing down, and that awkward and clumsy is normal at first – we can begin to play with these selves when they arise.

Here’s a scenario:

I’ve failed at a big task. The “persecutor” self steps forth and begins his monologue about worthlessness, about me being crappy at this thing, about me not being good enough.

But something has changed. I’m aware that it’s the Persecutor talking. And I say to myself, perhaps, something like, “That’s interesting.”

He begins to get anxious. He looks around for help. He tries to find things to distract me…where did I leave my car keys? What time is it?…so he can continue his act.

But I stay aware, calm, slow, breathing, watching him.

Then I observe. Simply observe.

And then, only then, is choice possible.

*on a side note, this process, of freezing our degrees of freedom, happens when we are “psychologically” stressed as well.

True human nature

All of this culture-speak recently has brought me to a realization about the nature of human beings.  (check out this recent article on animal morality)

It is our nature to consume.  It is our nature to consume everything available.  It is our nature to fight.  It is our nature to lie.

All of these things are our nature.  All are natural.  All animals do the things we do.  There is no separation between man and other animals, except in the ways we choose to express that common nature.

The question then is not “what is human nature?”  Human nature is animal nature.  Both are ultimately Nature’s nature.  We are not separte from Nature, except through artificial constructs.  As we’re starting (slowly) to learn, we are directly connected to the cycle of Nature.  There is no separation there.  Pollute, and ye shall be polluted.

The question is – “In what direction, to what end, do we exercise that nature?”

Any “law” points, automatically, to what is otherwise natural for us to do.  Laws are a social agreement, to force us to moderate ourselves, for the sake of society, for the sake of civilization.

For instance, let’s consider the 10 Commandments from the Christian Bible:
1. Have no other gods before Me
2. Worship no false idols/images
3. Don’t take the Lord’s name in vain
4. Remember the Sabbath
[Work 6 days, rest 1] – this one is “hidden” in there
5. Honor your father and mother
6. Do not commit murder
7. Do not commit adultery
8. Do not steal
9. Do not bear false witness
10. Do not covet anything belonging to your neighbor.

It is our nature to do all of the things we “shan’t” according to the 10 Commandments.  Otherwise we wouldn’t need “laws” prohibiting us from doing them.  We’d naturally not do them.

What’s the point?

Well, for one, remember that human beings are animals.  We’re not far removed at all from “the wilde beastes” (read Chaucer for true insight into human nature) that haunt the dark wood.  If you want proof, send me an email and I’ll send you the video file a friend just sent me showing Taliban members beheading “infidels” with what looks like a butcher knife.

The second point is this – when we become mindless, we descend into savagery.  And I don’t mean “savagery” as “poverty” or “third-world status.”  I mean we descend into a state where “third-world” even makes sense.  We descend into a realm of subjugation, of putting people into work camps and gas chambers…of putting animals into subjugation.

We’ve embraced the method of the mind so much, that we can’t turn back.  We have to continue on this path.  We’ve effectively destroyed any culture that didn’t rely on the mind-at-the-expense-of-harmony.

Recognize your nature and befriend it.  Don’t shun, deny, or ignore it.

We do this all the time.  It results in feelings of guilt or shame.  “I had sex with my neighbor’s wife” [not me, this is figurative!].  You are ashamed, you are guilty.  But why did you do it?  Because you couldn’t help yourself?  Or because you tried to deny that you could do such a thing, and ignored the impulse in you until it was too late?

I see the same tendency in people fighting to become “fit.”  They come to the gym and work out once a week, or twice.  Then go home and chow down on whatever is in front of them.  “I couldn’t help it.  I couldn’t stop myself.”

Yet you could stop yourself from working out every day?  No.  I disagree.  You couldn’t admit that it is your nature to want to eat everything.  To want to consume all around you.  To want to expand, to live.  And so, when the plate was put before you, you had already relinquished control through denial.

“I don’t want to eat everything I see…I just can’t help myself.”

The path of least resistance is also a natural law.

When you accept your nature, then it becomes your choice what law you live by, and how.  Then you can truly choose.

Nonviolent Communication

Why do people do things?  Why have you done the things you’ve done in your life?

When you look for an answer to this question, you’re usually given so many answers that the question becomes meaningless.  People do things for reasons involving need, desire, utility, or common sense, or pragmatic sense, or individual history, philosophical leanings/beliefs.

Or they do things for reasons other than those.

Or sometimes, they do things for a combination of those reasons.

Or the do things “for no reason at all.”

NLP says that people always have a good outcome in mind for themselves when they do things, and I believe this is true.  They believe that they will get something valuable from their actions.

But what is at the base of “why people do things” is something much simpler.  Marshall Rosenberg’s book “Nonviolent Communication,” reveals that we almost always do things based on (in our culture, often un-felt, unrecognized, or unappreciated) needs.

Look back over your life, and consider the following.

All of this time, you had your own agenda.  It was separate from that of those around you.

And it was always the same – to get your needs met.

Did you know that that was true?  (I didn’t, until I read the book).

If you did/do know that already – do you express your needs as your needs.  Or do you express your needs as other people’s problems (‘that person doesn’t know how to drive!’ – really, is ‘I need to feel safer than I do right now’)?  Do you express your needs as complaints (‘my boss never appreciates me,’ – really, is ‘I need to feel more appreciation for my efforts at work’)?  Grievances (‘my parents never supported me,’ – is, ‘I need to feel supported/loved/cared-for’)?  Perceived wrongs, etc.?

Do you know that your feelings are expressions of, and signposts pointing toward, your needs?

Rosenberg gives a simple formula for beginning to explore this concept.  The next time you begin to blame someone else for your situation (problem, issue, etc.), say to yourself “I feel x, because I y.”

Usually, the “because” is an unexpressed or unrecognized need that you have.

To boot, toward the middle of the book, a subject heading called “Don’t Do Anything That Isn’t Play!” appears!

Marshall emphasizes that we should “make choices that are motivated purely by our desire to contribute to life rather than out of fear, guilt, shame, duty, or obligation.”

Being fit is also about being able to express yourself, authentically, in a way that other people can understand, relate to, and respond to.

I highly recommend this book to anyone who reads.  I’ll be reading it again, myself, very soon.