Return of the Caveman

While I am an advocate for all things “natural,” I also am an advocate for thinking – using the brain.

A friend recently sent me the link to the site “Hunter-Gatherer.com.”  I’m not providing a hot-link to you, because it’s a front-site, with a signup form if you’re “interested.”  Put your email in the box and hit send, and Hunter-Gatherer will inform you when there’s something happening there.

The site was setup by John Durant, a 26-year old internet marketing professional.

Grog like SEO! Grog like Stumbleupon! Grog like Affiliate Marketing!

What Is This Paleo Stuff All About?

The “paleo” movement basically states that our species, homo sapiens, has not evolved very much over the past 200,000 years, since it branched off the tree of Homo (that sounds silly! tee hee!).

Anyway, these folks say that the diseases of modern civilization arise largely from us acting like a bunch of fat agriculturalists – eating too many and the wrong kinds of calories, not moving/exercising enough (and sucking at it when we do), and basically being too smart to realize how dumb we are.

This movement has been around for a long long time.  Roughly 35 years now.  It’s not new.

Not only is it not new.  It’s not hard to understand.  You can get any of a number of books on Amazon.com, used, for less than the price of your non-paleo mocha latte.  If you want.

You can erect my homo anytime...wait...what? I mean, "Ug."

The Caveman Speaks!

You can watch John on the Colbert Report – here.

If you don’t have the time, let me sum it up for you – John says that “human beings have been around for a half or a million years in our current form,” (Which is technically incorrect.  Homo Sapiens, which is what we are, is about 200,000 years old) and that it would behoove us to eat and move like we did during that part of our evolutionary history.

John also says that hunter gatherer societies live(d) to about the same ages that we do now.  From everything I’ve ever read, this is completely untrue.  Average maximum lifespan is usually listed between 35-55 years in anything I’ve read about pre-agricultural humans.

Further, life expectancy increased significantly after the advent of agriculture.  Maximum lifespan increased significantly again after the advent of modern medicine.

Apparently, John has taken some notes from Art DeVany, an economist-turned-physiology-expert, who runs his own “paleo” blog and internet business.  DeVany chapped my ass a few years ago when I posted a question about one of his (then free-to-all) workouts, and the rationale behind his set/rep scheme.  He didn’t publish the post.  I deleted his blog from my roll.

Wherefore Art Thou, Customer?

Internet marketers are savvy.  They will often put up a “test” website (such as John’s) with a signup form (such as John’s) to see what size audience they can get, before investing time, money, and effort in building an actual site.

They also jump on popular bandwagons.  I’m not saying that John Durant doesn’t live, eat, and breathe Paleo.  I believe that he does.  I’m just saying that this Caveman is no dummy.  He’s a smart Caveman.  He’s a Caveman with internet access.  He’s a Caveman with deer in his apartment.

Beatrice de Gea's photo of John from the NYT article

What Do You Care, Josh?

I don’t care that much.  I actually think it’s pretty cool.  But I’d really like for people to be well-informed about this stuff, and be listening to people who know what they’re talking about, rather than internet marketers with a caveman fetish, or retired economics professors who like to boost their testosterone levels a lot.

The caveman thing, like all things, will come and go.  In the meantime, many people will get caught up in the wave, and ride the diet rollercoaster for a while, messing their physiology up so bad that they’ll actually shave years off in the long run.  But as long as it’s a fun ride, that’s all that matters!

Which reveals something about human nature.  And about why you like to buy things.

Why You Like to Buy Things

Virginia Satir is said to have said (you like that?) – “The most basic instinct of human beings is not the instinct for survival, but the need to experience the familiar.”

Maybe she’s right.  Maybe not.

But right around the same level of that instinct is the need for the unfamiliar.  Human beings have a desperate, unquenchable thirst for what is novel.  It’s like a drug.  Start showing people one new thing, and they want another, then another, and then another…

This is your brain on advertising

The Bottom Line

Be critical.  Death is lurking.  In fact, you might die right now.  I hope not, but you might!

If you are a caveman, or follow a caveman lifestyle, you might live longer.  Maybe.  Or you might not.  The hope of longer life may be part of what John is selling to you.  That and novelty.  And “happiness.”  The old hag in a new dress.

It’s catching, this “paleo” thing.  I don’t think it’s entirely wrong, or misguided, but I want you to be sure that it is being sold to you.

The line just above the death one, the penultimate line, is your physiology – the way the human body functions.  Knowing more about that is useful knowledge.  Then you have a solid baseline by which to judge any diet, any exercise routine, or anything else in your life.

Beyond that, the Caveman movement should be seen for what it is – fun.  It’s just play.  Play Caveman if you want.

I’ll play Dinosaur, and come to your cave and eat your head.

GRRR!! Now THIS IS REAL!! GRRRR!! snarfsnarf

Good Calories, Bad Calories – Review

Bread and butter?! Yummy!!! Ohhh....

On page 169 of his book, Gary Taubes quotes Albert Einstein, who once said that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.”

Why didn’t Gary take Albert’s words to heart?!!!

This book is awesome, in every sense of the word. It is a comprehensive look at the research surrounding diet and obesity, since research in that area began.

It is also incredibly dense and difficult to read, and, I think, poorly structured. Themes, dates, studies, characters, are repeated throughout the book. I wish Gary had hired an editor!!!

That being said, the book is still incredible. It’s an amazing look into the vagaries of science – that there is essentially only conflicting evidence around the diet-heart, or cholesterol-heart hypotheses, and that those ideas have been driven mostly by fame-hungry researchers, or by the impetus of the thrust of research itself (once the general tenor is set, research tends to continue in the same direction). It is a fascinating look at human dietary physiology.

Earlier today, I was speaking with a client about this book, and saying that I had reached the point (at page 384…roughly 80 still to go, after two months of plodding) where I wished Gary had produced a Cliff Notes version of his book.

Then, lo and behold, on page 453-4 of the book, he does. I’ll quote the entire “summation” here, because I think the message is important. It goes against everything we’ve been told for the past 30-50 years. But that stuff wasn’t really backed up by anything at all. Read the following passage, and if you’re still interested, read the book!

“As I emerge from this research, though, certain conclusions seem inescapable to me, based on the existing knowledge:
1. Dietary fat, whether saturated or not, is not the cause of obesity, heart disease, or any other chronic disease of civilization.
2. The problem is the carbohydrates in the diet, their effect on insulin secretion, and thus the hormonal regulation of homeostasis – the entire harmonic ensemble of the human body. The more easily digestible and refined the carbohydrates, the greater the effect on our health, weight, and well-being.
3. Sugars – sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup specifically – are particularly harmful, probably because the combination of fructose and glucose simultaneously elevates insulin levels while overloading the liver with carbohydrates.
4. Through their direct effect on insulin and blood sugar, refined carbohydrates, starches, and sugars are the dietary cause of coronary heart disease and diabetes. They are the most likely dietary causes of cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and the other chronic diseases of civilization.
5. Obesity is a disorder of excess fat accumulation, not overeating, and not sedentary behavior.
6. Consuming excess calories does not cause us to grow fatter, any more than it causes a child to grow taller. Expending more energy than we consume does not lead to long-term weight loss; it leads to hunger.
7. Fattening and obesity are caused by an imbalance – a disequilibrium – in the hormonal regulation of adipose tissue and fat metabolism. Fat synthesis and storage exceed the mobilization of fat from the adipose tissue and its subsequent oxidation. We become leaner when the hormonal regulation of the fat tissue reverses this balance.
8. Insulin is the primary regulator of fat storage. When insulin levels are elevated – either chronically or after a meal – we accumulate fat in our fat tissue. When insulin levels fall, we release fat from our fat tissue and use it for fuel.
9. By stimulating insulin secretion, carbohydrates make us fat and ultimately cause obesity. The fewer carbohydrates we consume, the leaner we will be.
10. By driving fat accumulation, carbohydrates also increase hunger and decrease the amount of energy we expend in metabolism and physical activity.”

I’m going to go have a donut and some ice cream!!!

UPDATE – 2011
God-bless the ability to change our minds!

I read this book while in grad school, and understood some of the science, but had little time to really dig deep into Taubes’ arguments.

Needless to say, I also never stopped eating any sort of carbohydrate or modified my diet in any way (see my last statement…I literally did that that day…).

Since that day, I’ve read more deeply, and seen the ridiculous extent to which “paleo” and other low-carb advocates have gone in deriding carbohydrates of all sorts, and trying to push their bizarre dietary agenda on the world.

For instance – read this post.

So now, read this post, for the most comprehensive and thoughtful look I’ve ever seen at the carbohydrate/fat/obesity debate.

Good Calories, Bad Calories

Just started the book “Good Calories, Bad Calories” by Gary Taubes a couple of days ago.  I’m only on page 100, but it’s already incredibly eye-opening.

I’m not going to go into incredible detail (till I’ve finished reading it).  But suffice it to say that there has been a campaign in this country against the reality of diet for at least 50 years.

I’ll delve into this topic more shortly, too, but there’s been a similar campaign around exercise…

more later

HDAD ADD ADHD 01101101 !!! %$%#^!!!

A maddening blog title, I know.

Reminds me of something else.

Pills.  Prescriptions.  Advertisements.  Marketing.  Products.

Science isn’t bad.  I love science.  Science is WONDER.  That is the basis of all science.  Science is playful.  It has to be.

What happens before and after science, though, is something else.

In exercise, a lot of emphasis is placed on counting.  How many repetitions?  How much weight?  How often?  What kind of posture?  To what degree?

For the most part, these measurements are completely meaningless.

Sorry to break it to you.  You’d have the same if not better results if you just focused on how you were feeling while you were doing things.  Granted, you need to exercise some caution when throwing heavy things around.  You need to have a general idea of how your body works (though that can be entirely intuitive, and still be just as effective).  But once you have those things, you can just go for it.

It’s better if you do.

For one thing, you’ll be more likely to stick with it for a while.  You’ll also develop something called “somatic awareness” – an understanding of your body on an intuitive level…something you absolutely cannot develop when another person is constantly telling you what to pay attention to.

In diet, the counting goes to calories.  Equally as meaningless effort.  Follow a basic rule – eat plenty of food that comes out of the ground or eats something that comes out of the ground, in the purest form possible (i.e., organic, grass-fed, non-abused, unpackaged, not overcooked, etc.), and you can throw away your calorie counter.

Do the opposite, and you’ll develop a habit of being obsessive compulsive.  That’s how things work.  You do a behavior often enough, and it becomes habit.  Period.

I think that’s something that happens to cultures.  Part of the reason that cultures disintegrate eventually.  They begin to feed upon themselves, by definition.  They establish rules, and, at first, the rules are followed.  But eventually, the rules have been focused on for so long that they become the hangman’s noose of the culture.

I wrote about this in a different sense in a previous post. I guess it’s just crystallizing a bit more.

Watch out for your noose!!!  If you feel like you’re too obsessed, you probably are.  Our culture wants you to be.  That’s how it sells you things you don’t need.

Good night!

Born to Run

First off, sorry it’s been a while.  If you’ve been reading for a while, you know my grandmother passed away about a month ago.  Between that and “life,” I’ve struggled to keep up recently.

However, “here I’m is,” as they say.

I just finished reading “Born to Run.”  Christopher McDougall’s excellent book is a combination of a historical treatise on the history of endurance (especially ultra-endurance) running and the Tarahumara Indians, barefoot running overview, and personal experience with running.

As with most books on exercise, the science bits of this book left me very unconvinced.  These scientists say that humans gained bigger brains because we ran.  But wait, they said we gained bigger brains because we ate more meat.  But wait, they said we should eat vegetarian diets if we’re going to be long-distance athletes…

Let’s skip the “science.”

The best part of the book is the narrative McDougall weaves, and the lessons he interjects, seemingly casually, throughout that narrative.

His accounts of the Tarahumara Indians, and other great runners, not only smiling, but laughing, as they ran 100 miles, really resonated with me.  Also, the stories of the great distance runners who were great because of the extreme joy they found in running – not because of macronutrient balance, heart rate workouts, or anything else.

It’s a joyful book, and a testament to finding joy in what you do, and looking for things that bring you joy.  I highly recommend this book to anyone out there who wants to be happier!

Happiness, and Grandma

I had a wonderful dinner at a barbeque at  Jen Fuller’s tonight, who is a most gracious host – lots of good food, drink, and conversation.

Of course, health was discussed at a certain point.  And everyone agreed that one ingredient is more critical to health and longevity than any other – happiness.

My grandmother, for me, is a case in point.

She lived to be 89 years old.  She died last Friday, a week ago, succumbing to cancer after a fight of 7 months.

For my grandmother, happiness was the secret to life, and life was the secret to happiness.

Every day, she once told me, she would wake up and say “Happy day, happy day!  Thank you Lord for another day on this earth!”

That was her attitude toward life.  She loved it, she loved the fact that she was alive, just because she was alive.

She grew up in the hills of Ashville, NC.  She was a hillbilly.  She grew up on a farm, and became a nurse as a young lady.  She was married before she got much nursing practice, though, and soon had two boys to care for (my father and his brother – my uncle).

She was a young lady in the 40′s and 50′s, when it was common to smoke and drink at any time, and for any occasion.  She carried her farm diet with her her entire life – bacon, eggs…fatty foods were common…so were pies, roasts, and the like.  Not “the image of health.”

In fact, one of the funnier more recent stories is from grandma’s visit to the hospital, just last year, for her regular check up.  She was the picture of health.  The nurse asked her, “Mrs. Leeger, do you drink?”

“Yes,” my grandmother said, matter of factly.

“How much do you drink, ma’am?” the nurse asked.

“As much as I want to,” my grandmother replied.

That got the nurse good!  She laughed, and asked my grandmother what, exactly, that meant.

“Well, it depends,” my grandmother said.  “If I’m at a party, and everyone is drinking, well I have a drink every time they do.  If I’m at home, I may just have one or two drinks on my own, or none at all.”

My grandma lived life the way I’d hope to.  She was happy all the time – whether times were good or not.  She trusted that her current situation was all that it could be.  And being all that it could be, it was as good as it could get.

As good as it could get, how could you be sad?  Unless you were just maudlin by nature.

She lived to be 89, without advanced exercise prescriptions, without sets and reps, without a boot camp, without Pilates, or Crossfit, or Powerlifting, or anything else.

She lived to be 89 by being happy – certainly, she had exuberance!

She lived to be 89 by living according to what she knew in her heart was right.

I miss her.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

Mythmaking

After a great conversation with one of the people I play with at the foot-camp today, I have quite a bit to say about control.  I’ll try to make it as cohesive (and brief) as possible.

First, many (if not all) of our beliefs and ideas about control are myths.

The word “myth” means “story.”  Human beings have used stories to relate things to one another, probably as long as we’ve existed as a species.

As a story, a myth is always a subjective storytelling.  It is always perspectival – it is always based on the individual opinion or worldview of the person telling the myth.

The source of our myths, or what we accept as a “valid” mythology, has changed in different eras.  However, there has almost always been an individual, or “type” of individual (an office, of sorts) whose stories we agree to believe unconditionally.

This office is different depending on our culture.  It is culturally dictated.  In some cultures, we only believe the myths our shaman tells us.  In others, we only believe the myths told us by our politicians.  In others, those told to us by warlords.  In others, it is the scientist who has myth-telling authority.  It depends on the culture you make yourself a part of.

You can probably have more than one official myth-teller in your culture, but the more you have, the more confusing things become.  When you are part of a political-myth culture, but you have developed strong religious-myth beliefs, you have to find a religious-politician, or a political-religious leader, whose myths you can believe in.

Also, at times, we create our own myths about ourselves, and listen to no one else – “I am not good enough,” or, “I am better than everyone else,” or, “My nose is too big,” etc.  Those are stories we tell ourselves.

All of the stories we tell ourselves, or choose to believe, serve a purpose.  There may not be a single purpose underlying all myths – but on the other hand, there might.  At least in the sense that all of the myths that we choose to believe, as individuals, define who we are or who we can be as individuals.  Not only that, but they also usually define who we are or who we can be within the culture(s) to which we claim membership.

As I mentioned in my last post, much of the dietary information available today is mythology.  It is storytelling, done, sometimes by scientists, but more often by “pop-culture” writers.  Neither telling is the whole truth.  As I mentioned above, any storyteller can only tell the story as they see it…which usually also means that they tell it as they want it to befor them.

Coming up with solutions to perceived problems usually grants power in most cultures.  One problem might be – “Where do I go when I die?”  The religious storyteller solves this problem with their myth, and they are rewarded accordingly.

Another might be – “Why am I fat?”  Here, the scientists or writer myth-maker tries to solve the problem.  They offer their solution, in expectation of appropriate reward for their effort.

But the story is incomplete.  It is a splinter from the log.  It is the reflection off of a facet of the jewel that is the problem.

In the most recent Exuberant Animal blog post, Frank Forencich cites a report from Robert Sapolsky, noted stress researcher:

“In Scientific American, December 2005, Sapolsky writes:
‘individuals are more likely to activate a stress response and are more at risk for a stress sensitive disease if they…

feel as if they have minimal control

feel as if they have no predictive information

have few outlets for their frustration

interpret the stressor as evidence of worsening circumstances

lack social support’”

Indeed, this is much of what our mythmaking seeks to combat.  It is actually the most important “risk factor” – unhappiness, stress, despair.

All disease is stressful.  Stress, undue stress that we cannot deal with, is a disease state.  For Sapolsky, stress is a primary concern.  It’s what he studies.  It’s his area of myth officialdom.

While all of these perspectives are important, valuable, and enriching, we need to make it a regular habit to step back from our mythologies and look at the gem itself.  Even though we can’t take it in (because, ultimately, it is All That Is), we can move back and play with the interrelationships between the myths we’ve chosen to believe in.

In this sense, taken together, all of the risk factors we hear about – dietary cholesterol, fats, refined or processed (re-pro) products (for instance, re-pro products like high fructose corn syrup, or re-pro products like car exhaust), stress (of any sort that we cannot resolve – emotional, psychological, physical, environmental), lack of movement, excesses and deficiencies of any sort – are equally to blame, and play an equal role in mortality.

The degree to which we can mitigate those risk factors is the degree to which we can live a healthy human life.  That life will go through developmental stages, cycles of growth and degeneration, of vitality and illness.  That process includes birth and death, creation and dissolution.  Depending upon how many of those risk factors that we have to deal with, over what duration and in what quantity, we’ll live, on average, 75-100 years.

This hasn’t really changed that much since the beginning of the human species.  In Ancient Greece, for instance, Aristotle lived to be 62.  He died in 322 BC.  That was 2300 years ago.  Sophocles, the playwright, lived to be 90.  That was in 400 BC.  Plato was about 76 when he died, in 348 BC.  Cicero was 63, in 43 BC.  Most of the “upper class” of Ancient Rome lived to be in their mid sixties or beyond – if they weren’t killed before then (cultural/environmental risk factors).

While the global averages for lifespan have increased in the past two centuries, thanks to the advent of available medicine and hygiene, the human lifespan has remained relatively unchanged.  If we live in an area low in risk factors, we live a good while.  The greater the risk factors, the lower our lifespan.

Most important is this – Understand that you choose the myths you participate and believe in.  Then change the ones that aren’t conducive to your health, happiness and longevity.

Find an environment that’s not just “not-stressful,” but that actually makes you feel exuberant!  Find a culture that supports your exuberance, and take part in it as often as possible.  Understand your myths, and get rid of the ones that are harmful.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

Diet…is there a mystery here, or not?

I just read the most recent post over on “Mark’s Daily Apple,” called “The Definitive Guide to Saturated Fat,” and wanted to share my response here, on my blog, because I think it’s pertinent to the continuing diet debate in our country.

Here’s my comment:

I wonder about dietary information beyond “eat what’s natural (i.e., non-processed food, or efls’s, and being as “natural” as possible (untampered with, organic, etc.)), in season, from your local area.”

These studies all seem to point to one thing – people live for about 75-100 years.

The folks from the areas with higher mortality rates live in places where medical care and hygiene are comparatively low; and in some cases, where warfare or death due to violence is comparatively high.

The human body, like any organism, has a high degree of adaptability (which is why we’re still around), and it seems to me that the body will find a way to subsist on anything “natural” as long as it isn’t poisonous (either as a quality or as a quantity (excess)).

Fats, carbohydrates, proteins…whatever, in any crazy combination, as long as you aren’t getting too many or too few of one over the other two, which doesn’t really happen if you’re eating the way mentioned in the first paragraph.

After all of the reading I’ve done, having lived to this point and met people from all kinds of places and walks of life, etc., I really wonder about this topic a lot.  As a lot of people mention, there is very little evidence that saturated fat intake (or cholesterol level) are directly correlated to heart disease or mortality, particularly when taken by themselves (without adding other risk-factors like smoking and other stressors).

Most people, especially in “first world” countries, where healthcare is efficient and swift, live to be about 75-100 years of age.  The outliers eat EFLS (edible, food-like substances, per Michael Pollan), have high levels of stress, genetic diseases, etc.

I don’t know…I may be completely off base about this.  I’d love to hear your thoughts.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

You are going to die

This isn’t a joke!  You are going to die…someday.

I hope that it isn’t soon, and that it isn’t painful.  But nevertheless, it will happen someday.  That’s how life works.

What strikes me as strange is the obsessiveness with which we often approach our prejudices toward certain things.  Specifically, for this blog, I’ll discuss this with relation to fitness – but it’s true of anything.

People in the fitness world have all sorts of “rules” that you’re supposed to follow.  Eat this, don’t eat that.  Exercise this much, but no more, and no less.  Do this ten times a day.  Do that once a month.  Eat these pills once after every other meal on Wednesdays.

You’re supposed to “activate your core” and build [insert bodypart here] “of steel.”  You should only drink non-flouridated water from a holy stream that trickles from the top of Everest for one month every Spring.

You need to “challenge your proprioception and balance.”  You need to do “multiplanar exercise” and get into your “heart rate zone.”

And you do!  You race around, doing all this stuff.  You eat organic, you drink the Yogic water, you practice your Asana’s, you give your Pilates instructor a cash gift every Christmas.

Then you die.

And not only do you die, but you probably die roughly around the same age as everyone else in your generation.  Maybe you live ten year longer than your fast-food-abusing classmates.  And maybe not.

Maybe you live a couple of years less than the person who ate moderately well, and exercised moderately, all those years.  And maybe not.

My point is this – there’s little credence to most of the bullshit we try to sell ourselves and each other every day.

Will fast food kill you?  Yes, in excess.  In excess anything will kill you.  Unhappiness is a killer if sustained for too long.  Too much sunlight (plus other environmental stressors…like sunscreen) will give you cancer.  Too little, also, can kill you.

You are going to die.  The most important thing is that, while you’re alive, you get the most out of it, and help others to do the same (so that they, in turn, will help you, etc.).  Do things you love to do.  Do things that make you really effing happy.  I mean – EXUBERANT.  DO THEM NOW!  And help others to do the same.

And forget about all those bullshit “rules.”  You know what’s good for you.  Do it.

Where we have gotten to

Does that title sound convoluted?

Yes.  I think so.

A little redundant?

Indeed.

Why the redundancy, you ask?

To prove a point!

To me, it seems that we have taken a very simple thing – the health of the human being – and turned it into an incredibly convoluted, complex thing.

Here’s how simple health is:

Move often, in as many ways as possible.  Exert yourself, and then give yourself rest.  Rest as much as you need to, so that you can do as much as you can physically.  Eat till you’re full, and stick to food that’s been handled by human hands as little as necessary.

That’s it.

No reps.  No sets.  No diets.  No calorie-counting.  No restrictions.  No prescriptions.  Move vigorously in as many ways as possible, rest fully, eat unprocessed foods till you’re full – repeat.

Yes, it’s just that simple.

It’s how we evolved.  It’s why your great- or great-great grandparents could live for 80+ years eating bacon and eggs for breakfast every day.  They worked hard.  Physically.

If there was one thing I might add, one prescription, it would be this – Do all of those things with joyful companionship.

All of the rest is gravy, or icing, or lard – whatever you like best.  Rep it out.  Calculate sets till your hands fall off.  Track volume.  Measure joint range of motion and flexibility with fifty goniometers.  Active release-, ballistic-, and static-stretch the shit out of yourself.  But remember, that’s all just extra.  The only thing you really need to be happy and healthy, is the most basic, is free, is accessible now – move, eat, laugh, share – but above all – MOVE