All I can say is, take the time to read Stephan’s post.
It’s the most well-thought-out, thorough writing on the subject that I’ve ever seen.
All I can say is, take the time to read Stephan’s post.
It’s the most well-thought-out, thorough writing on the subject that I’ve ever seen.
I’m not a huge fan of scapegoats, the blame-game, or not being responsible for your own life and behavior, but let’s face it, there are factors that are simply out of our control.
Or are they?
Some of them are. Genetics, anyone?
I love the old bodybuilding question – “I have small calves, how do I get them bigger? I’ve tried everything.”
I know people for whom this is literally true. And you know what, I’m not sure if there’s a solution out there for them. They’re just always going to have small calves. Sorry guys, your lineage just didn’t store a lot of meat on the lower leg bones. Oh well. But look on the bright side, that leaves more time to focus on developing other things in life.
Sometimes genetics can be a serious hurdle. But genes almost always require an environmental trigger that switches them on.
That is, if you have the “fat gene,” it just means you’re more likely to get fat than the person who doesn’t have it. But it doesn’t mean that you HAVE TO GET FAT.
Knowing your genetic tendencies can be a huge help to guide your action.
Got the fat gene? Stay the hell away from refined carbs of any sort forever. FOREVER.
And that’s the point – If we KNOW about the things that are influencing our behavior or development, we can ACT to use that knowledge to our advantage.
That is – there are a lot of things that ARE within our control…if we can recognize them and act on them.
The big one that hit me today, and that spurred me to write this post, is LANGUAGE.
We all have habitual patterns we live through. Most of us tend to put our clothes on in exactly the same way every day. We use the same hand to hold our toothbrush. We get into the car the same way, we do the same things, AND…
We talk about and listen to the same stuff almost all the time.
Within our relationships – at home, work, or play – we tend to use language the same way. We tend to use the same words all the time, in the same patterns.
Since “birds of a feather flock together” we can safely guess that our friends, families, and probably coworkers, do the same thing.
So what does that have to do with being fat?
Well, before we talk about fat, let’s give a more extreme example.
If you work in a gym, or you’re a personal trainer, your vocabulary is probably full of anatomy and physiology terms. You probably tend to speak in action-terms (DO this, DO that, PULL, PUSH, GO, etc.). Most of your friends are likely involved in health and fitness to some degree, so they have a similar way with words (or can at least understand your way).
This “action logic” spills over into your very being. Or maybe it’s vice versa…maybe your very being spills over into your language. It’s probably a little of both.
Now let’s imagine someone who has a weight problem. I can recall a particular family I knew that would always talk about how FAT they were. Their language was PASSIVE. “We’re so fat. We need to do xyz, BUT…” insert excuse.
Within that family, everyone pretty much used the same words to describe their condition, and their relationship to their condition.
Other people might even have a VICTIM language about being fat and lazy – as if their condition is being done to them.
Want to change your condition? Want to change your “shape” (or get “in shape”)? Want to “get fit?”
Check your language, and the language of the people you hang out with.
Since “the way you do anything is the way you do everything” – it probably needs to change as much as your “habits” or whatever else you’re focused on.
NOTE: I realized this is about the third or fourth post that hinges on MINDSET, so I’ve created a mindset category. If you want to see all of the posts about mindset or mindframes related to fitness, just click on the Mindset category on the right hand side of the page.
NOTE 2: It is not unhealthy to have extra body-fat!
My friend sent this picture around the other day:
If you can’t see the point of this, the add says that for every “Mega Jug” of Pepsi you buy, KFC will donate a portion of your $3 to the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation.
Heard of the Ouroboros?
It’s the old snake/dragon eating its own tail trick!
I’m not referring to the cyclical nature of reality aspect of the Ouroboros, but rather, tot he concept of circular reasoning.
We see this type of reasoning a lot these days. Perhaps it’s just because it’s one of those easy Jedi Mind Tricks that people usually tend to fall for:
(find other Logical Fallacies here)
You see, if there is no Pepsi Mega Jug, there is a much lower risk of juvenile diabetes. If you lump all soft drinks and other high-sugar junk food under the label of “Pepsi Mega Jug” the risk for juvenile diabetes falls to almost nothing.
“Have you ever been the ‘fat kid’?”
I had a reader ask me this after my most recent blog post, and, coincidentally, had asked another blog writer whether or not they’d ever been the “fat kid” after reading an incendiary attack on fat people on their blog.
My reader sent this article – From Hunk to Chunk and Back Again.
It details the journey of Australian personal trainer P.J. James, who decided to gain 90 pounds (he actually put on 88) so he could better relate to his clients.
He noticed muscle pains, blood sugar spikes, and other physical maladies, but the most difficult ills were psychological.
“The transition back into training was the hardest moment for me because I just didn’t have any desire to train at all, and I was addicted to fat and sugar at the same time so my motivation was at an all-time low.”
He’s lost some of the weight now, and is planning on losing it all by January 1, 2010, which will give him six months of experience with being overweight.
The short answer to the question posed by my reader is “no.”
I’ve never been the “fat kid.” In BMI terms, I’m currently “overweight,” at a BMI of 27. However most of that overweight is muscle. Science says that it doesn’t matter…that a certain height can only support a certain amount of mass (there’s a ratio they’ve worked out). Only time will tell…
The reader’s comment was specifically in response to my saying that we need an “anti-fatness” campaign.
I just want to be clear – I’m not against people who are fat.
I am against people whose minds are “fat.” And by that, I mean, lazy. Is it not PC to connect those two terms? Am I contradicting myself? Well…okay.
This is why, though, my Surgeon General’s Warning warns against laziness…not fatness.
For my money, being physically active takes precedence over bodyweight. Though, again, science would disagree. A few recent studies show that you need to do both. There is definitely a “safe range” for overweight in the human animal.
However, our culture focuses on physical form to a large degree, so concerns over image often come first in people’s minds.
While it may seem that I’m one of those, for whatever reason – I’m not.
My concern is with function. Initially, in organisms, function follows form (structure), and then, during the course of the organism’s life form follows function.
That is a restating of “nature and nurture.” However, there has to be a “nature” there to “nurture” first. Form/structure comes before and mediates function.
And no, I’m not going to do the P.J. James experiment.
But I will watch my use of language more closely in the future. Thanks for the note!
Part of make believe is that you know it isn’t real.
When we begin to take things as real that are not real, we are, technically “insane.”
Now, what is our culture aimed at? What is your participation in your life aimed at? Is it aimed at understanding what is fundamental, what is real? Or is it aimed at artificialities?
How much do you believe what you hear or see on the radio, TV, magazines, newspapers, movies, or internet?
How much do you believe what you hear or see in your personal relationships?
How much of it is real?
In the realm of fitness, you’ll often hear advice like “you have to see yourself as being thin…” or “you have to see yourself succeeding.” This type of visualization practice can be helpful, but usually only in elite athletes, who’ve already succeeded at “seeing themselves succeed” at things by actually doing them.
We hold the brain, and the product(s) of the brain – our mind and thoughts – in such high regard these days, that we forget that only one thing changes the brain – action.
Passivity, motionlessness, inaction – all are death.
Action. Activity. Doing. Movement. Physical doing. Those things change the brain. In turn they change the mind, and change our thoughts.
So what good are your thoughts? Get rid of them.
Get more action.
After a great conversation with one of the people I play with at the foot-camp today, I have quite a bit to say about control. I’ll try to make it as cohesive (and brief) as possible.
First, many (if not all) of our beliefs and ideas about control are myths.
The word “myth” means “story.” Human beings have used stories to relate things to one another, probably as long as we’ve existed as a species.
As a story, a myth is always a subjective storytelling. It is always perspectival – it is always based on the individual opinion or worldview of the person telling the myth.
The source of our myths, or what we accept as a “valid” mythology, has changed in different eras. However, there has almost always been an individual, or “type” of individual (an office, of sorts) whose stories we agree to believe unconditionally.
This office is different depending on our culture. It is culturally dictated. In some cultures, we only believe the myths our shaman tells us. In others, we only believe the myths told us by our politicians. In others, those told to us by warlords. In others, it is the scientist who has myth-telling authority. It depends on the culture you make yourself a part of.
You can probably have more than one official myth-teller in your culture, but the more you have, the more confusing things become. When you are part of a political-myth culture, but you have developed strong religious-myth beliefs, you have to find a religious-politician, or a political-religious leader, whose myths you can believe in.
Also, at times, we create our own myths about ourselves, and listen to no one else – “I am not good enough,” or, “I am better than everyone else,” or, “My nose is too big,” etc. Those are stories we tell ourselves.
All of the stories we tell ourselves, or choose to believe, serve a purpose. There may not be a single purpose underlying all myths – but on the other hand, there might. At least in the sense that all of the myths that we choose to believe, as individuals, define who we are or who we can be as individuals. Not only that, but they also usually define who we are or who we can be within the culture(s) to which we claim membership.
As I mentioned in my last post, much of the dietary information available today is mythology. It is storytelling, done, sometimes by scientists, but more often by “pop-culture” writers. Neither telling is the whole truth. As I mentioned above, any storyteller can only tell the story as they see it…which usually also means that they tell it as they want it to be – for them.
Coming up with solutions to perceived problems usually grants power in most cultures. One problem might be – “Where do I go when I die?” The religious storyteller solves this problem with their myth, and they are rewarded accordingly.
Another might be – “Why am I fat?” Here, the scientists or writer myth-maker tries to solve the problem. They offer their solution, in expectation of appropriate reward for their effort.
But the story is incomplete. It is a splinter from the log. It is the reflection off of a facet of the jewel that is the problem.
In the most recent Exuberant Animal blog post, Frank Forencich cites a report from Robert Sapolsky, noted stress researcher:
“In Scientific American, December 2005, Sapolsky writes:
‘individuals are more likely to activate a stress response and are more at risk for a stress sensitive disease if they…
feel as if they have minimal control
feel as if they have no predictive information
have few outlets for their frustration
interpret the stressor as evidence of worsening circumstances
lack social support’”
Indeed, this is much of what our mythmaking seeks to combat. It is actually the most important “risk factor” – unhappiness, stress, despair.
All disease is stressful. Stress, undue stress that we cannot deal with, is a disease state. For Sapolsky, stress is a primary concern. It’s what he studies. It’s his area of myth officialdom.
While all of these perspectives are important, valuable, and enriching, we need to make it a regular habit to step back from our mythologies and look at the gem itself. Even though we can’t take it in (because, ultimately, it is All That Is), we can move back and play with the interrelationships between the myths we’ve chosen to believe in.
In this sense, taken together, all of the risk factors we hear about – dietary cholesterol, fats, refined or processed (re-pro) products (for instance, re-pro products like high fructose corn syrup, or re-pro products like car exhaust), stress (of any sort that we cannot resolve – emotional, psychological, physical, environmental), lack of movement, excesses and deficiencies of any sort – are equally to blame, and play an equal role in mortality.
The degree to which we can mitigate those risk factors is the degree to which we can live a healthy human life. That life will go through developmental stages, cycles of growth and degeneration, of vitality and illness. That process includes birth and death, creation and dissolution. Depending upon how many of those risk factors that we have to deal with, over what duration and in what quantity, we’ll live, on average, 75-100 years.
This hasn’t really changed that much since the beginning of the human species. In Ancient Greece, for instance, Aristotle lived to be 62. He died in 322 BC. That was 2300 years ago. Sophocles, the playwright, lived to be 90. That was in 400 BC. Plato was about 76 when he died, in 348 BC. Cicero was 63, in 43 BC. Most of the “upper class” of Ancient Rome lived to be in their mid sixties or beyond – if they weren’t killed before then (cultural/environmental risk factors).
While the global averages for lifespan have increased in the past two centuries, thanks to the advent of available medicine and hygiene, the human lifespan has remained relatively unchanged. If we live in an area low in risk factors, we live a good while. The greater the risk factors, the lower our lifespan.
Most important is this – Understand that you choose the myths you participate and believe in. Then change the ones that aren’t conducive to your health, happiness and longevity.
Find an environment that’s not just “not-stressful,” but that actually makes you feel exuberant! Find a culture that supports your exuberance, and take part in it as often as possible. Understand your myths, and get rid of the ones that are harmful.
This isn’t a joke! You are going to die…someday.
I hope that it isn’t soon, and that it isn’t painful. But nevertheless, it will happen someday. That’s how life works.
What strikes me as strange is the obsessiveness with which we often approach our prejudices toward certain things. Specifically, for this blog, I’ll discuss this with relation to fitness – but it’s true of anything.
People in the fitness world have all sorts of “rules” that you’re supposed to follow. Eat this, don’t eat that. Exercise this much, but no more, and no less. Do this ten times a day. Do that once a month. Eat these pills once after every other meal on Wednesdays.
You’re supposed to “activate your core” and build [insert bodypart here] “of steel.” You should only drink non-flouridated water from a holy stream that trickles from the top of Everest for one month every Spring.
You need to “challenge your proprioception and balance.” You need to do “multiplanar exercise” and get into your “heart rate zone.”
And you do! You race around, doing all this stuff. You eat organic, you drink the Yogic water, you practice your Asana’s, you give your Pilates instructor a cash gift every Christmas.
Then you die.
And not only do you die, but you probably die roughly around the same age as everyone else in your generation. Maybe you live ten year longer than your fast-food-abusing classmates. And maybe not.
Maybe you live a couple of years less than the person who ate moderately well, and exercised moderately, all those years. And maybe not.
My point is this – there’s little credence to most of the bullshit we try to sell ourselves and each other every day.
Will fast food kill you? Yes, in excess. In excess anything will kill you. Unhappiness is a killer if sustained for too long. Too much sunlight (plus other environmental stressors…like sunscreen) will give you cancer. Too little, also, can kill you.
You are going to die. The most important thing is that, while you’re alive, you get the most out of it, and help others to do the same (so that they, in turn, will help you, etc.). Do things you love to do. Do things that make you really effing happy. I mean – EXUBERANT. DO THEM NOW! And help others to do the same.
And forget about all those bullshit “rules.” You know what’s good for you. Do it.