A Most Revealing Pyramid

Another great post from JR prompts a follow-up piece by me.

This one is about food subsidies by the Federal government, the Farm Bill. It comes from The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. Hopefully, I’m not violating anything in reproducing this chart they created:

These Pyramids Weren't Built By Aliens!!!!

As PCRM’s post points out, the Farm Bill not only provides food subsidies, but also decides much of what will constitute school lunches.

With a Food Pyramid like that, who needs enemies?!

The most recent post on the Neuroanthropology Blog discusses Obesity and family medicine – and the fact that some family physicians are starting to recognize family and environmental factors as decisive in treating childhood obesity.

I point this out in my comment on their site, but the author (and the physicians) forgot to include governmental subsidization of different food products (and governmental leadership, generally) in their factor-analysis.

As I’ve said before, the body follows the head. This is true in organisms, cultures, and governments.

In cultural/organizational terms, the Federal government is often the “head” of the social-body. It leads via policy (such as subsidies, land-usage policies, etc.), and also by example (accruing massive amounts of debt, etc.).

Further, much of what constitutes “popular” media takes its cue from the Federal government. “Truth in advertising” relies on governmental moderation. The nullification of the Radio Fairness Doctrine in 1987 had serious repercussions as to what type of messaging has dominated radio advertising since (see my post on the anti-smoking campaign of the early ’70′s and how the Fairness Doctrine was a decisive part of that movement).

I’m happy that MD’s are not as “isolationist” in their thinking as they may have been in the past, but the issue needs to be sussed out in its full depths – which includes holding governmental bodies, and the bodies (i.e., people) who make up those “bodies,” responsible for the way food is produced and marketed in our country.

Thank You, Mrs. Obama – Let’s Move, and Partnership for a Healthier America

Michelle Obama, wife of our President, is taking a stand for physical education and fitness.

She’s started an initiative called Let’s Move!, that has a website to boot!

The group has four initiatives – Healthy Choices, Healthier Schools, Physical Activity, and Accessible and Affordable Healthy Food.

Yes, let's!

“To support Let’s Move and facilitate and coordinate partnerships with States, communities, and the non-profit and for-profit private sectors, the nation’s leading children’s health foundations have come together to create a new independent foundation – the Partnership for a Healthier America – which will accelerate existing efforts addressing childhood obesity and facilitate new commitments towards the national goal of solving childhood obesity within a generation.”

Partnership for a Healthier America

Linked to in the header above, the Partnership is composed about five founding organizations.  It’s a way to provide additional support, financial and outreach, for the Let’s Move! project.

Ok Pepsi, let's see what you've got!

Pepsi, On the Bandwagon

Pepsi Co. has announced that it’s going to support Mrs. Obama’s initiative a few ways.  First, they’re changing the way they list calories on their container.  They’re also going to provide funding for some movement initiatives.

The Old and the New Me

The old me would be suspicious, and doubtful of any change coming from this type of thing.

The new me – or, rather, me, now – sees any effort toward a positive direction as a good thing.

Please support the Let’s Move! initiative by going to the site and subscribing to the blog roll, and enter your email address to receive program updates as they come out.

It only works if everyone pitches in…

FDA Reconsiders Labeling Guidelines

Another goodie from the NYT, that’s too good not to comment on: “One Bowl = 2 Servings. F.D.A. May Fix That.”

Finally, it seems, things are starting to make sense.

Or are they?

Unfair Trade, with my GI Tract

Ben & Jerry’s
When I was in college, we’d all get together now and then, have some food, drink a few bottles of wine, and then each polish off our own pint of Ben & Jerry’s.

Didn’t seem like a lot of ice cream, but I knew what was in it. I worked for Fresh Fields (now Whole Foods), and was keen on dietary information.

A pint of Ben & Jerry’s had something around 1300 calories in it. I think there were 30+ grams of fat per serving. And it tasted delicious!

It didn’t bother any of us. I think we were all young and active enough to be able to burn that stuff off. I don’t know. We’ll find out in another fifteen years or so, when one of us keels over.

Wherefore Art Thou, Nutrition?
Until then, I want to ask the same question I always ask – what does this mean?

Seriously, folks. Do food labels lead to any change? The NYT did another piece in October of last year, showing that the posting of caloric value of foods in restaurants’ windows didn’t lead to any change.

So what is the meaning of this? More regulation? More change?

One of the things that we do know about human (or animal) behavior, is that animals are less likely to be concerned when something appears immediately obvious or transparent.

In that same October NYT article, in fact, the people going into the restaurants with posted nutrition values had actually consumed more calories on average than customers had before the posting took place.

I know you want some.

Something to Gain, Something to Lose
Who is gaining from these new rules? Not Americans. Not “the common man.” At least, the common person isn’t gaining anything but extra girth, and a new risk-factor on their health insurance application.

Someone else is gaining something, too. Who is that?

Change is happening, but to what end? And on whose terms?

Good Calories, Bad Calories

Just started the book “Good Calories, Bad Calories” by Gary Taubes a couple of days ago.  I’m only on page 100, but it’s already incredibly eye-opening.

I’m not going to go into incredible detail (till I’ve finished reading it).  But suffice it to say that there has been a campaign in this country against the reality of diet for at least 50 years.

I’ll delve into this topic more shortly, too, but there’s been a similar campaign around exercise…

more later

Creating Markets

Hello!  It’s me again!

I’m not a doctor…but I play one on TV!

Vicks 44

Yes…that’s right. Blah blah blah, buy Vicks, dummy…blah blah blah, Vicks, blah blah, Adult, blah blah, formula, blah, you’re under, blah, my, blah, command, blah, blah blah…

Sure, Vicks might help you to feel better.  But is it medicine?  It’s mostly alcohol.  It’s the same stuff parents have been giving their kids (or themselves) for years to keep them quiet and peaceful while the cold wages war in their body.

You can drink Vicks, or you can drink something tastier…a hot toddy, perhaps.

I’m not saying this with absolute certainty, so don’t quote me.  But I’ve never seen any scientific validation for Vicks.  Or for any cold medicine, for that matter.

Have you?

If it’s out there, please send it to me.  This article seems like a fairly good summary of the research, and ends up saying that over-the-counter drugs have no effect versus traditional (or any other) methods for treating the common cold.

So why Vicks?  And why a guy who is not a doctor, but plays one on TV?

Well, it’s the same reason your running shoes exist.  There’s no scientific (or other…except cultural) validation for those, either. Also see this article.

Neither, in fact, is your choice of a hybrid vehicle.  When you total the costs of design, production, shipment, etc., of your hybrid, you come up with something that is probably a little more expensive than the car you’re driving now.

Let alone the fact that a hybrid is made predominantly of plastic (hi, petroleum product, doesn’t degrade, chokes the oceans), still uses gas (albeit less…though probably insignificantly less), has a ton of batteries in it (can’t just throw those out), uses tires made of rubber (that’s a petroleum product too) and has oil that needs to be changed just like a regular car.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7rNYzSH-BA&hl=en&fs=1&]

I don’t want to piss on your candle, but it’s time to wake up.  The auto industry is as interested in saving the world at their expense as a tiger is.  That’s right.  A tiger.  You can’t even communicate the concept of “saving the world” to a tiger. Try communicating it to an industry.

So what am I saying?
All of these things have something in common.  Your running shoes exist because Nike figured out how to create a market for something non-essential.  The same thing Starbucks Coffee did.  The same thing the auto-makers do now.  The same thing Vicks cough syrup does.  The same thing your local gym does (you don’t need a gym to work out…you don’t need a treadmill to run, you don’t need any of that crap, and in fact, you’d be much healthier/more fit without it).

They create the feeling in you of need, that doesn’t truly exist, in order to get you to buy something.

“I’m not a doctor, but I play one on TV,” is pure genius.  First, he’s being honest, albeit in a smarmy way.  Then, he’s a face you (or your mother, who watches the soap opera he’s on, and who buys the groceries/cold medicines for your house) recognize.  Finally, he represents the concept “doctor.”  He says the word.  You look at him and think “doctor.”  He plays one.  He is a nice guy.  He’s trying to help me.

He’s trying to help me to buy something with red food coloring, with possibly toxic substances, bottled in a plastic shell that will choke the oceans – the source of life on this planet – forever.

Stop.

Stop watching TV.

Stop believing what people are selling you.

Stop buying shit.  I mean, anything.  Buy food.  That’s good.  Try to get food that’s not been run through a petroleum-powered processing plant, or grown on a petroleum-farmed field, or pumped full of Vicks cough-syrup because it’s crammed into pens tighter than your office cube.

Start thinking.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

High Society = Dysfunction?

Today’s entry was instigated by a comment Pete Egoscue makes in his book “Pain Free“:

“Do we unconsciously associate dysfunctional and functional physical characteristics with certain social groups?  Indeed we do, and ironically it is many of the dysfunctions that are regarded as cool and stylish.  Every spring- and fall-fashion season, I’m again struck by the ‘look’ that designers create using models who grow ever more stoop-shouldered, whose heads hang, and whose torsos tip forward.  They slouch down the runways in Paris, New York, and London with their feet everted and their hips rolled back into flexion.” (pg. 168)

Just prior to that passage, Pete talks about the gag from old TV shows, where the country bumpkin somehow gets invited for tea with the high-society folk.  He slurps it up, his elbow straight out, while they gingerly tip their cups from the wrist, elbows down, staring at the rube in distaste.

I’ve often wondered about this facet of human behavior.  It’s ubiquitous – everywhere at once – and present in every “civilized” culture that’s ever existed.  It’s the tendency for what is “high class,” or “most civilized,” to be furthest from what is natural (and, in that regard, also furthest from being healthy).

Here are some examples:

  • The Western Chair - this device is okay if used in strict moderation.  But these days, it is used more than a person uses their legs!  Its constant use results in a chain of dysfunction that creates more health problems than I want to list here.
  • “Refined” Foods - white rice, flour, etc.  Any refined food was originally prized because it basically got you high.  All of the nutrients that would ordinarily buffer the effect of the carbohydrates in the food were stripped away in the refining process, leaving, essentially, sugar.  ALL HAIL WHITE FOODS! screamed the jittery upper-crust (who were the only ones who could afford them).  When the lower class aspired to be upper class, they did so by eating what the “smart” upper crust ate.  Sugar.
  • Fashionable Clothing - Egoscue is right.  Dr. Victor Barker writes about the deleterious effects of high heels on women in his book “Posture Makes Perfect.”  Among them, posterior pelvic tilt, which results in decreased sensation during intercourse, increased chance of premature birth, and eventual dowager’s hump in the upper thoracic spine.  But fashionable clothing doesn’t stop with shoes.  What about “skinny jeans?”  They certainly restrict blood flow to the legs and feet.  But they also limit movement, or capacity for movement.  What about the business suit?  Have you ever tried to work out in a business suit?  I haven’t yet (though the day is coming soon  ; )  ), but I have a good idea of what it will be like – that suit is going to be shredded by the end.
  • Movement Mores – the teacup example Egoscue lists isn’t alone.  Every culture has its own rules of etiquette, that are typically linked to old necessities versus any real physical benefits.  You wouldn’t put your elbows on the table because otherwise you’d tip it over!  You don’t wear your hat when dining because it’s filthy dirty!  Some of them,though, are simply, again, “posturing.”  Sitting up straight at the dinner table might make you look “proper,” but it’s bad for your back!  You need to shift positions frequently, especially if you’re locked into a chair all day!  Further, many “civilized” people have admonitions about adults getting down on the floor or behaving in “childish” ways at all.

One of the things that amazes me about all of these rules is that they’re so energy/time consuming compared to their alternatives.  If you didn’t have to sit in a chair, for instance, you wouldn’t have to buy one!  And then no one would have to make one!  There are plenty of cultures (even now) that don’t use chairs.  More time for other things.

Food is no different.  Refining foods takes a huge amount of energy and time, compared with preparing them in their natural state, or eating them raw.  Fashionable (read “uncomfortable”) clothing also takes a lot of time to make compared with more comfortable and movement-friendly clothing.  If you’ve read my blog, you already know how I feel about shoes!  And, finally, restrictive movement mores actually require more energy in the long run than being free to move as needed.  Does it take less energy to “sit up straight” at the dinner table for an hour, or to slouch a bit now and then?

But more than anything I’m surprised by how much our “civilized” ways act as detriments to our natural healthy state.  It’s almost like civilization is an anti-health drug in some ways.  Don’t get me wrong.  I love the USA, I like going to the movies, I sit in chairs and eat in restaurants.  But I also sit on the floor a lot, crawl on all fours, put my elbows on the table, and wear Vibram Fivefingers as much as possible.

Try something different this week – sit on the floor, roll around on your back and make “snow angels” in your carpet, put your elbows on the table at dinner, lift your elbow when you drink, eat unrefined/unprocessed foods, and wear something a little more comfortable.  See how you feel.