Irreasonable – You can’t save money if you watch TV

Just saw a commercial for Progressive Auto Insurance on TV and had a stark realization:

You can’t save money if you watch TV.

It’s physically impossible.

Here’s why:

If you watch TV, you’re watching commercials created to sell things (such as auto insurance).

It costs money to create the commercials.

The companies get the money for the commercials from TV-viewers’ purchases of their products.

If TV viewers did not watch TV, and did not know about the product (auto insurance), they could not buy auto insurance.

Given that TV viewers do watch TV and do learn about saving money with auto insurance through TV, they then go and spend money on auto insurance.

Spending money is the opposite of saving money.

Therefore, you cannot save money if you watch TV.

Good night.

Nickelodeon’s Worldwide Day of Play

According to their website, Nickelodeon is going to “go dark” this Saturday, the 26th of September, for three hours, and is encouraging families and kids to take that time to go outside and play!

Not only that, they’ve posted a free pdf that has a bunch of games and other ideas for your playtime activities.

I think it’s a great idea!

When I was a kid, my sister and I were “allowed” to watch only two hours of TV a day…of course, that changed a bit when we were left unattended, and as we got older and the television became even more ubiquitous in our culture.

I wonder during what time those three hours will fall…

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

OCD-land

I’m convinced that one of, if not the, defining element of current American (US) culture is OCD/ADHD.

It’s everywhere.  People want to count calories, count repetitions, count weight, count volume, count miles run, count times, compare times, compare weights, compare reps, compare sets, count cancer cases, count bees, count count count count.

And it doesn’t change anything.  In fact, I’m not sure it does much at all, other than to perpetuate the counting.

Let’s take exercise as an example, since that’s what this blog is purportedly about.

Do you burn more calories when playing a game on a playground than you do on a treadmill [most likely]?  What is the optimal work/rest interval to burn the most calories (on the playground or on the treadmill) [no such thing exists]?  Exactly how many pitches can little Johnny (or Beth) sustain before he (or she) suffers overuse injuries in the rotator cuff [one too many for him/her]?  How high must one be able to jump in order to be a pro basketball star [vertical leap is poorly correlated with basketball performance]?  When is the best time to start lifting weights [whenever you feel ready]?  How frequently should I workout every week [whenever you feel up to it]?  How much cardio should I do [as much as you feel like doing]?  What type of weight training should I do – bodybuilding, Olympic lifting, powerlifting, corrective exercise, fitness training, Crossfit type stuff [whatever floats your boat]?

I’m still trying to come up with a single answer to all of these questions.  I know it’s out there.  It’s something like this – “Do whatever you feel like doing.”

Now, there is a problem, in that many people will attempt to do things they have no experience with and get injured.  It’s like wanting to do some underwater welding, going out and buying the equipment, and jumping into the lake with it.

“What the heck?!  It can’t be that hard to figure out!”

So I’ll give you that one.  It is hard to figure out.  Especially when you have no experience.

But the solution to that part is simple – find someone who knows, and ask them.

Then you have to do something.  You either have to take their advice, and do what they’re telling you (for better or worse), or look for another opinion (for instance, find someone who says you CAN get washboard abs sitting on your couch!!!!), or do nothing at all.

I think what bothers me is that no one teaches THE BASICS.

Here are THE BASICS as I see them:

  1. Understanding your body
  2. Learning to listen to and hear your body
  3. Doing things that are agreeable to your body

That’s it.  At any level, you can go as deeply as you choose, getting a PhD in each, if you wish.   But you must engage in those three steps in order to succeed – and success here, is being a healthy human being.  Beyond that, you don’t have to do anything.  You don’t have to count calories, or miles jogged.  You don’t have to have a workout log, or go to a class every week.  You don’t have to do anything in particular.  But you must do something.

Yes, Josh, but what does that have to do with OCD?  Well, once you practice those three things, you don’t have to count anything anymore.  You don’t have to obsess.  You don’t have to be distracted.  In fact, once you do those three things, you don’t even have to do those three things anymore!

Note – This post brought to you by the mother at Jackson Playground this morning who told her maniacal kids “If you don’t calm down, I won’t let you watch TV when we get home.”

Dear playground-mom, the solution to our shared misery is simple – you didn’t run them enough at the playground that you were then rushing to leave, only to sit their unexhausted minds down in front of the boob tube…

The God Within and Without

Julian Jaynes was an American psychologist who wrote a book called “The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind.” His theory was that consciousness arose as a result of a breakdown between the barrier that had previously separated the right and left hemispheres of the brain – specifically, the hemispheres responsible for speech. Mr. Jaynes provides a compelling accumulation of research in his book.

Of most interest to me in this post, is his analysis of religion in the book. Mr. Jaynes outlines a possible etiology of religion. He ties both of these theories together, by showing how our earliest recordings of religions recount their adherents’ hearing the voice of God.

In fact, this was so common that each family had a God in a central location in the home. Mr. Jaynes suggests that what these people were actually hearing was their own internal dialogue. But without the associative help of the left hemisphere, they couldn’t understand that the voice was their own consciousness.

Theology aside, the history he provides of the cultures that worshiped idols placed in central locations in their homes compels us to ask another question. If Mr. Jaynes is right, what replaced that physical, mental, and social need to hear commands from on High? Simply understanding that it was our own internal voice couldn’t fulfill the desire to have a connection with one’s “Higher Power.”

As evidence that that understanding wasn’t enough, look to the churches, cathedrals, and other religious monuments that populate our man-made environment. They’re everywhere! And in the center of each, is the idol we fashion, to which we look for guidance, though mute.

Tonight, Jim Fleming’s interview with Cameron Sinclair on KQED immediately brought Mr. Jaynes’ work to mind. She lamented the central place that a certain appliance holds in our homes, and wishes living rooms could either be without them entirely, or that it at least be relegated to a peripheral location.

I can’t help but wonder, what service the television really provides to us? And with the amount of TV being watched by average American’s hovering somewhere around 4 hours per day, the question becomes more interesting. When we think about the fact that TV viewing takes precedence over even the most natural urges, like moving, I feel like there’s something very deep going on here.

Where is the TV placed in most homes? Where is it in your home?

What is your relationship with this Oracle? And is it giving you what you seek?